|
As
GIS software is becoming widely used in a
variety of applications, the need to provide
confidentiality of data used by GIS arises.
The faculty of the Earth Sciences and
Resources Institute and the Department of
Computer Science and Engineering at the
University of South Carolina collaborated to
study information confidentiality issues in
GIS context and to define an access control
model for a multi-user geodatabase within an
enterprise-level GIS environment. This
project discusses our findings and
difficulties during the implementation of
the model to enforce access control in
spatial databases created with ArcGISTM
8.1, ArcSDETM 8.1 and MS SQL
ServerTM 2000.
Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) are becoming more
and more widely used in a variety of
application domains, creating the need for
multi-user support, sophisticated data
management, global connectivity, and information
security.
Until recently, most of the research
work on GIS focused on providing powerful
tools for manipulating (i.e., capturing,
storing, retrieving, transforming,
analyzing, and displaying) spatial data
[1,2,3,4].
The most widely used GIS software are
the products of Environmental Systems
Research Institute (ESRI) [ArcView®,
ArcInfoTM, ArcGISTM],
Intergraph [GeoMedia® and Modular
GIS Environment (MGE®)]
Autometric [SoftPlotter®, KDMS®,
and SQS®], MapInfo [Professional®
and MapBasic®], and GRASS GIS
[5,6,7,8]. However, most GIS provide
little or no support for multilevel
information confidentiality. Clearly,
this is unacceptable in a large, multi-user
environment where some of the data
manipulated by the GIS software are
confidential.
Since
1999 the Earth Sciences and Resources
Institute at the University of South
Carolina (ESRI-USC) has generated large
amounts of spatial data, some of which are
confidential and/or proprietary. These data
need sufficient access control measures to
adequately serve users of the application
domain. The institute currently has
undertaken an internal project to establish
an enterprise level GIS environment within
the institute and to create a seamless
spatial data repository for the entire state
of South Carolina. But until now (October
2001) no security measures have been
adopted.
|